Must design protest or sell? Design can be both a means of political expression and a sales tool. But which is the more desirable purpose? Is it necessary to use design to express one's opinion on current political issues, to make one's voice heard? Or is it our job to promote products and companies, to characterize and shape their image? Are we perhaps unconsciously making a political statement by the way we choose to display something, and is the decision for or against a client or product already a small protest? Based on these statements, Laura Holst asked herself whether this very political attitude is not completely at odds with the purpose of design, which is to make something appealing to people and to market something. Or is this very attitude necessary for design to be truly free? To take this question to the extreme, she has set herself the task of marketing freedom and has created a series of advertising posters for freedom.